Related topics

Vista Results for my budget system.
NoStop nos...@nospam.com comp os linux advocacy alt os windows-xp microsoft public windows vista general Hadron wrote: NoStop <nos...@nospam.com> writes: Download Speed with XP: 2405 kbps Upload speed: 462 kbps ... essentially the same for both stacks The tests were repeatable with always very similar results.

Bug in Windows explorer can result in lost files
I think it's pathetic that Windows Media PLAYER doesn't play DVDs. Any other suggestions? Thanks. Chase "phat28vr6" wrote: I run both x32 and x64 vista and DVDs I have two different DVD players in my system and both have the results as I described. Here's my system: Intel Core 2 Duo 6600 4 Gigs of RAM Gigabyte

UAC
Try www.google.com Results 1 - 10 of about 19600 for Simple MAPI compatible mailer installed. (0.09 seconds) http://groups.google.com Results 1 - 10 of 590 for Simple MAPI compatible mailer installed looking for microsoft.public.windows.vista.* finds http://groups.google.com/groups/dir?

No search results (IE7 and Windows Vista)
Microsoft said it would continue to sell Windows XP until June 2008, delaying a scheduled transition to Vista. Brooks, who oversees consumer marketing of Vista, said he is confident the company can bring in enough new customers to offset the revenue declines from lowering prices after seeing the results of a recent

Microsoft commissioned reports on Windows Vista SP1 performance
I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate on it right now, with full features. Yeah, "just fine" is allright for budget systems. You missed the "with full features" part. Just like a 400Mhz iMac with 196MB of RAM used OSX Jaguar with "full features". That was also a budget system My system outdoes a Mac that's twice its

"search results in indexed locations"
... Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarna...@gmail.com> writes: [snips] On Thu, 24 Jan 2008 17:57:20 +0100, Peter Köhlmann wrote: Do you really think that "benchmarks" from more than 3 years ago (when the compiler and the CPU were newcomers on the market bear any resemblance to actual results? Heh. Didn't even catch the date.

error 80070424 windows update VISTA
Didn't get to try actually hooking a vcr up and attempting to capture video so I don't know what the quality of the results would be like but the app did now come up without errors, drivers worked fine and it could obviously communicate with the capture device. So it is Vista incompatibility that is causing my

Internet Explorer 7 Crashes in Windows Vista
Try again. http://www.google.ca/search?sourceid=navclient&aq=t&ie=UTF-8&rlz=1T4ADB R_enCA252CA253&q=windows+Vista+is+great You are searching for article's that have the words Windows, Vista, and Great. Using non-phrase searching on these nearly equal results... xp is better than vista = 727000 vista is better than

WAIT for Windows VISTA when buying a new computer?
Andrew And...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista installation_setup Right, I called the activation line and eventually was put onto a tech. Upgrading the motherboard essentially results in a new computer, to which the original operating system software cannot be transferred.

Authetication issue from outlook 2007 in Windows Vista to exchange
lNVALID comp sys mac advocacy http://www.thisisbroken.com/b/2007/04/windows_vista_s. html ----- When it can't find what you are searching for, Windows Vista politely tells you so. But in the same screen, it asks you if you found what you were looking for. Doesn't it know that you didn't?

Vista Results for my budget system.
Stephen Baker Stephen_Ba...@discussions.microsoft.com microsoft public windows vista general This is only a problem I have in Vista. I have Vista Ultimate. What happens is that every time I play a video I get this occassional stutter. These are not shows I'm recording or anything like that from Vista;

Parallels Desktop and Windows Vista -- Success? -- Failure?
Colin Barnhorst c.barnho...@comcast.net microsoft public windows vista hardware_devices I could not find your specific model number on the Sony support site. However, according the the "This decision is based on test results generated by installing and using the Windows Vista operating system on a VGN-A130.

Windows Mail Error Message
Computers with a base score of 5 were the highest performing computers available when Windows Vista was released." Well, better luck next time, I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate on it right now, with full features. Yeah, "just fine" is allright for budget systems. Yet it cost half the price of the nearest

[Rival] Windows Vista = XP with Less Applications, Less ...
robertmi...@bellsouthNOSPAM.net microsoft public windows vista mail "ddw170" <ddw...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:051A3CAA-A952-4D84-8887-ABC57677787B@microsoft.com... I just happened on to "search results in indexed locations" and there are a ton of things listed - some emails from 2006 and

Bitmap manipulation under Windows Vista
C1E2D2DB0063B0AFB0220...@news.supernews.com>, TaliesinSoft <taliesins...@mac.com> wrote: Curiosity is getting to me. What results have those that have installed Windows Vista under Parallels Desktop had? Good? Bad? Indifferent? I installed Windows Vista on my MacBook Pro. It runs better then Windows XP.

Whoops, Windows Vista already #2 behind XP.... Linux still ...
"WenJun Zhang[msft]" wjzh...@online.microsoft.com microsoft public inetserver iis Hi Luis, Actually the behavior hasn't been changed since Windows 2003 IIS6.0 ServerVariables["REMOTE_ADDR"]); %> When I hit this page via http://localhost/UsrTechSmokeTest/foo.aspx I get the following results: LOCAL_ADDR = ::1

Parallels Desktop and Windows Vista -- Success? -- Failure?
If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included. Why didn'tI get that same thing with "windows vista"? Fewer semi-duplicate entries. No, more results and I am saying that this indicates an high level of hype, and perhaps a high-level of "worry" about Windows Vista. And the Linux results?

Vista Profile damaged with Windows 2003 delprof.exe
Maxim Shatskih, Windows DDK MVP StorageCraft Corporation ma...@storagecraft.com http://www.storagecraft.com <juergen.hai...@gmail.com> wrote in message Then you must run the appropriate WLK test once for each platform and save the test results (.CPK files) sounds fine. The question is: where can I find the WLK

Windows Vista Release
What about the second symptom the article refers to, concerning the "Windows Features dialog box"? Did you try testing that case too? What were the results? FWIW I don't use Vista so I can't do any of these tests myself but your symptom--blank forms in pages from the Windows Update site reminds me of similar

UAC
Computers with a base score of 5 were the highest performing computers available when Windows Vista was released." Well, better luck next time, when you might be I'm running Windows Vista Ultimate on it right now, with full features. Yet it cost half the price of the nearest comparable Mac when I bought it,